Italian Manufacturing and Service Firms Labor Productivity: a Longitudinal Quantile Regression Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/5305Keywords:
intangible capital, internationalization, labor productivity, longitudinal quantile regressionAbstract
Labor productivity is very complex to analyze across time, sectors and countries. In particular, in Italy, labor productivity has shown a prolonged slowdown but sector analyses highlight the presence of specific niches that have good levels of productivity and performance. This paper investigates how firms' characteristics might have affected the dynamics of the Italian service and manufacturing firms labor productivity in recent years (1998-2007), comparing them and focusing on some relevant sectors. We use a micro level original panel from the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) and a longitudinal quantile regression approach that allow us to show that labor productivity is highly heterogeneous across sectors and that the links between labor productivity and firms' characteristics are not constant across quantiles. We show that average estimates obtained via GLS do not capture the complex dynamics and heterogeneity of the service and manufacturing firms' labor productivity. Using this approach, we show that innovativeness and human capital, in particular, have a very strong impact on fostering labor productivity of lower productive firms. From the sector analysis on four service' sectors (restaurants & hotels, trade distributors, trade shops and legal & accountants) we show that heterogeneity is more intense at a sector level and we derive some common features that may be useful in terms of policy implications.References
C. ALTOMONTE, T. AQUILANTE, G. B_EK_ES, G. I. OTTAVIANO (2013). Internationalization and innovation of firms: evidence and policy. Economic Policy, 28, no. 76, pp. 663–700.
J. M. ARNOLD, K. HUSSINGER (2005). Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis. Review of World Economics, 141, no. 2, pp. 219–243.
S. BIFFIGNANDI, A. ZELI (2010). Integrating databases over time: what about representativeness in panel data? presented at Third InternationalWorkshop on Business Data Collection Methodology April 28-30 2010, Destatis, Wiesbaden, Germany.
M. BUCHINSKY (1994). Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure 1963-1987: Application of Quantile Regression. Econometrica, 62, no. 2, pp. 405–58.
M. BUCHINSKY (1998). Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research. Journal of Human Resources, 33, no. 1, pp. 88–126.
I. A. CANAY (2011). A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 14, no. 3, pp. 368–386.
D. CASTELLANI, G. GIOVANNETTI (2010). Productivity and the international firm: dissecting heterogeneity. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13, no. 1, pp. 25–42.
T. COELLI, D. S. PRASADA RAO, G. E. BATTESE (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
G. CRESPI, P. ZUNIGA (2012). Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries. World Development, 40, no. 2, pp. 273–290.
G. DOSI, M. GRAZZI, C. TOMASI, A. ZELI (2010). Turbulence underneath the big calm? Exploring the micro-evidence behind the flat trend of manufacturing productivity in Italy. LEM Papers Series 2010/03, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
R. EVANGELISTA, M. SAVONA (2003). Innovation, employment and skills in services. Firm and sectoral evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14, no. 4, pp. 449–474.
M. R. FERRANTE, M. FREO (2012). The Total Factor Productivity Gap between Internationalised and Domestic Firms: Net Premium or Heterogeneity Effect? The World Economy, 35, no. 9, pp. 1186–1214.
D. FRANTZEN (2003). The Causality between R&D and Productivity in Manufacturing: An international disaggregate panel data study. International Review of Applied Economics, 17, no. 2, pp. 125–146.
E. W. FREES (2004). Longitudinal and Panel Data: analysis and application in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
H. FRYGES, J. WAGNER (2008). Exports and Productivity Growth: First Evidence from a Continuous Treatment Approach. Review ofWorld Economics, 144, no. 4, pp. 695–722.
L. GRASSINI, G. MARLIANI (2009). Italian labour productivity changes : An analysis of firm survey data 1998-2004. In A. Viviani (ed.), Firms and system competitiveness in Italy, Firenze University Press, Firenze, pp. 39–56.
R. GRIFFITH, S. REDDING, J. VAN REENEN (2004). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, no. 4, pp. 883–895.
Z. GRILICHES (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
B. HALL, F. LOTTI, J. MAIRESSE (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33, no. 1, pp. 13–33.
T. HANSEN (2010). Exports and Productivity: An Empirical Analysis of German and Austrian Firm-Level Performance. Discussion papers in economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
L. HAO, D. Q. NAIMAN (2007). Quantile Regression. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
ISTAT (2007). Conti economici delle imprese – Anno 2003. Collana Informazioni no. 8, ISTAT, Roma.
R. KOENKER (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press, New York.
R. KOENKER, G. BASSETT (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46, no. 1, pp. 33–50.
R. KOENKER, K. F. HALLOCK (2001). Quantile Regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, no. 4, pp. 143–156.
T. MAYER, M. J. MELITZ, G. I. P. OTTAVIANO (2014). Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters. American Economic Review, 104, no. 2, pp. 495–536.
T. MAYER, G. OTTAVIANO (2008). The Happy Few: The Internationalisation of European Firms. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 43, no. 3, pp. 135–148.
M. J. MELITZ (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71, no. 6, pp. 1695–1725.
C. MILANA, A. ZELI (2004). Productivity slowdown and role of ICT in Italy: a firm-level analysis. In The Economic Impact of ICT. Measurement, Evidence and Implications, OECD, Paris, chap. 12, pp. 261–277.
R. NARDECCHIA, R. SANZO, A. ZELI (2010). La costruzione di un panel retrospettivo di microdati per le imprese italiane con 20 addetti e oltre dal 1998 al 2004. Documenti no. 7, ISTAT, Roma.
OECD (2001). Measuring Productivity: OECD Manual – Measurement of Aggregate and Industry-Level Productivity Growth. OECD, Paris.
OECD (2005). Communications Outlook 2005. OECD, Paris.
F. ONIDA (2002). Growth, competitiveness and firm size: factors shaping the role of Italy’s productive system in the world arena. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, 3, pp. 431–481.
M. PIANTA, A. VAONA (2007). Innovation and Productivity in European Industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, no. 7, pp. 485–499.
D. POWELL, J.WAGNER (2014). The exporter productivity premium along the productivity distribution: evidence from quantile regression with nonadditive firm fixed effects. Review of World Economics, 150, no. 4, pp. 763–785.
M. VELUCCHI, A. VIVIANI (2011). Determinants of the Italian labor productivity: a quantile regression approach. Statistica, 71, no. 2, pp. 213–238.
A. ZELI, P. MARIANI (2009). Productivity and profitability analysis of large Italian companies: 1998-2002. International Review of Economics, 56, no. 2, pp. 175–188.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Statistica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
