Determinants of the Italian labor productivity: a quantile regression approach


  • Margherita Velucchi Università degli Studi di Firenze
  • Alessandro Viviani Università degli Studi di Firenze



This paper investigates how some firms’ characteristics affect the dynamics of the Italian firms’ labor productivity in recent years (1998-2004) using an original panel from the Italian National Institute of Statistics at a micro level (firm level). The original database and a quantile regression approach allow us to highlight that labor productivity is very heterogeneous and that the relationship between labor productivity and firms characteris tics is not constant across quantiles. We show that estimates obtained via GLS do not capture the complex dynamics and heterogeneity of the Italian firms labor productivity. Innovativeness and human capital, in particular, have a larger impact on fostering labor productivity of low productive firms than that of high productive firms. Finally, we focus on three highly internationalized sectors and show that innovativeness, human capital and internationalization have a role on fostering labor productivity, with large discrepancy both across industries and quantiles.


ARNOLD J.M., HUSSINGER K., (2005), Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-level Analysis, Review of World Economics, 141 (2), pp. 219-243.

BARRO R. J., (1999), Notes on Growth Accounting, Journal of Economic Growth, 4(2), pp. 119-137.

BIFFIGNANDI S. ZELI A., (2010), Integrating databases over time: what about representativity in paneldata?, presented at Third International Workshop on Business Data Collection Methodology April 28-30, 2010, Destatis, Wiesbaden, Germany.

BUCHINSKY M., (1994), Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963-1987: application of quantileregression, Econometrica, 62, pp. 405-458.

BUCHINSKY M., (1998), Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guide for empirical research, Journal of Human Resources, 33 (1), pp. 88-126.

CASTELLANI D., GIOVANNETTI G., (2010), Productivity and the international firm: dissecting heterogeneity, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(1), pp. 25-42.

CAVES, D., CHRISTENSEN L., DIEWERT E. (1982a), The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity, Econometrica 50 6, pp. 1393-1414.

CAVES, D., CHRISTENSEN L., DIEWERT E., (1982b), Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers, The Economic Journal, 92, pp. 73-86.

COELLI T., PRASADA RAO D.S., BATTESE G.S. (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

DOSI G., GRAZZI M., TOMASI C., ZELI A., (2010), Turbulence underneath the big calm? Exploring the micro-evidence behind the flat trend of manufacturing productivity in Italy, LEM Working Paper Series, 2010/03.

EICHER T., STROBEL T., (2008), The Rise and Fall of German Productivity: Software Investment as the Decisive Driver, CESifo Economic Studies, 54(3), pp. 386-413.

FERRANTE M.R., FREO M. (2010), Measuring the “net” productivity premium of internationalized firms: a quantile regression decomposition approach, paper presented at ETSG 2010 Lausanne Twelfh Annual Conference 9-11 September 2010, University of Lausanne.

FRYGES H., WAGNER J., (2008), Exports and Productivity Growth: First Evidence from a Continuous Treatment Approach, Review of World Economics, 144 (4), pp. 695-722.

GALOR, O. (2005), The Transition from Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory, in P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf, eds., Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1A, Amsterdam, North Holland, pp. 171-293.

GRASSINI L., MARLIANI G., (2009), Italian Labour Productivity Changes: An Analysis of Firm Survey Data 1998-2004, in A. Viviani (eds.), Firms and system competitiveness in Italy, Firenze University Press, Firenze, pp. 39-56.

GRIFFITH R., REDDING S., VAN REENEN J. (2004), Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), pp. 883-895.

HALL B.H., LOTTI F., STROBELY T., (2009) Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy, Small Business Economics, 33, 1, pp. 13-33.

HANSEN T., (2010), Exports and Productivity: An Empirical Analysis of German and Austrian Firm-level Performance.

HAO L., NAIMAN D. Q., (2007), Quantile Regression, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

HULTEN C. (2001), Total Factor Productivity. A Short Biography, in New Developments in Productivity Analysis, Hulten C., Dean E.R. Harper M.J. (eds.) National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-54.

ITALIAN INSTITUTE FOR FOREIGN TRADE, (2010), L’Italia nell’economia internazionale, Rapporto ICE 2009-2010, Roma.

KLEINKNECHT A., MOHNEN P. (2002), (eds.), Innovation and Firm Performance, London, Palgrave.

KOENKER R., BASSETT G., (1978), Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46, pp. 33-50.

KOENKER R., HALLOCK K. F., (2001), Quantile Regression, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4, pp. 143-156.

KOENKER R., (2005), Quantile Regression Cambridge University Press, New York.

MAYER T., OTTAVIANO g.m. (2008), The Happy Few the internationalization of European Firms, Bruegel blueprint series, n. 3.

MELITZ M., (2003), The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71, pp. 1695-725.

NARDECCHIA R, SANZO R., ZELI A., (2010), La costruzione di un panel retrospettivo di microdati per le imprese italiane con 20 addetti e oltre dal 1998 al 2004, Rapporto di ricerca, ISTAT, Roma.

OECD, (2001), Measuring Productivity: OECD Manual-Measurement of Aggregate and Industry-Level Productivity Growth. Paris.

PROIETTI T., MUSSO A., (2007), Growth Accounting For the Euro Area: A Structural Approach, ECB Working Papers Series,804 August 2007.




How to Cite

Velucchi, M., & Viviani, A. (2011). Determinants of the Italian labor productivity: a quantile regression approach. Statistica, 71(2), 213–238.