Convergence processes in developing countries’ populations and the role of family planning commitments

Patrizia Farina; Livia Elisa Ortensi

doi:10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3605

Authors

Patrizia Farina Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Dipartimento di Statistica
Livia Elisa Ortensi Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Dipartimento di Statistica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3605

Abstract

We live in a world that is politically and economically influenced by demographic issues. Structural and economical characteristics and health issues play a significant role in the international political debate with often no real perception of their importance. The process of economical and demographical convergence in Developing World doesn’t follow the same path for all countries. The analysis of indicators related to the last 15-years period shows that a widespread improvement in demographic and development indicators doesn’t come along with a similar economic development. As a matter of fact on this second dimension countries that were at a more advanced economical stage in 1996 had the best improvements, while least developed remain still deepening pre-existing inequalities. Population structure follows a similar differentiation among countries that show first signs of ageing and others that remains with a pre-transitional structure. In this context family planning can significantly drive demographic transition even in absence of a substantial economic development.

References

A. ANGELI, S. SALVINI (2008), Popolazione e sviluppo nelle regioni del mondo, Il Mulino, Bologna.

A. BLANC (2010), The contribution of family planning to the reduction of maternal deaths United Nations Expert Panel on Fertility, Reproductive Health and Development - Panel discussion, New York, 7/12/2010.

J. BOONGARTS, (2006), The Causes of Stalling Fertility Transition, in “Studies in Family Planning”, vol. 37, n. 1, pp. 1-16.

J. BOONGARTS, (2008), Fertility Transition in Developing Countries: Progress or Stagnation?, Population Council, Poverty Gender, and Youth Working Paper, n. 7.

J.B. CASTERLINE, (2001), The Pace of Fertility Transition: National Pattern in the Second Half of the Century, in R.A. BULATAO, J.B. CASTERLINE (2001), Population and Development Review Vol. 27, Supplement: Global Fertility Transition, pp. 17-52.

J. CLELAND, S. BERNSTEIN, A. EZEH, A. FAUNDES, A. GLASIER. J. INNIS, (2006), Family planning: the Unfinished Agenda, in “The Lancet”, vol. 368, pp. 1610-1627.

R. EASTWOOD, M. LIPTON, (1999), The impact of Changes in Human Fertility on Poverty, in “Development Studies”, Vol. 36, pp. 1-30.

R. FREEDMAN, B. BERELSON, (1976), The record of Family Planning Programs, in “Studies in Family Planning”, vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 2-40.

N.E. HIMES, (1940), A Decade of Progress in Birth Control, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Sage, vol. 212, pp. 88-96.

G. MICHELI, (2011), Demografie, Mc Grow Hill, Milano.

W.C. ROBINSON, J.A. ROSS, (2007), The Global Family Planning Revolution, three decades of population policies and programs, World Bank, Washington D.C.

J.J. SPEIDEL, D.C. WEISS, S.A. ETHELSTON, S.M. GILBERT, (2009), Population Policies, Programmes and Environment, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, n. 1532, pp. 3049-3065.

UNITED NATIONS, (2002), Abortion Policies: A Global review, Population Division, New York.

UNITED NATIONS, (2011), World Population Prospect – Medium Fertility Variant. The 2010 Revision, Press Release 3/5/2011, New York.

DATA WAREHOUSE WEBSITES

http://www.un.org/esa/population/

http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/informationGateway.php

http://www.devinfo.info/

http://www.prb.org/DataFinder.aspx

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/

http://www.unfpa.org/swp/

http://www.who.int/research/en/

http://www.worldbank.com/