Proposed Optimal Orthogonal New Additive Model (POONAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3569Abstract
In this paper, the proposed optimal orthogonal new additive model (POONAM) is shown to remain more efficient than the recent additive model introduced by Gjestvang and Singh (2009). Several situations where the POONAM estimator shows efficiency over the Gjestvang and Singh (2009) model are simulated and investigated.References
J. A. FOX, P.E. TRACY (1986), Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys, “SAGE Publications.”
C. R. GJESTVANG, S. SINGH (2006), A new randomized response model, “Journal of the Royal Statistical Society” B, 68, 523-530.
C. R. GJESTVANG, S. SINGH (2009), An improved randomized response model: Estimation of mean, “Journal of Applied Statistics” 36(12), 1361-1367.
O. ODUMADE, S. SINGH (2008), Generalized forced quantitative randomized response model: A unified approach, “Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics” 62(3), 244-252.
O. ODUMADE, S. SINGH (2009a), Efficient use of two decks of cards in randomized response Sampling, “Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods” 38, (3-5), 439-446.
O. ODUMADE, S. SINGH (2009b), Improved Bar-Lev, Bobovitch, and Boukai randomized response models, “Communications in Statistics- Simulation and Computation” 38(3), 473-502.
S. SINGH, C.C. CHEN (2009), Utilization of higher order moments of scrambling variables in randomized response sampling, “Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference” 139(9), 3377-3380.
S. L. WARNER (1965), Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, 60, 63-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Statistica
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (full legal code).
Authors accept to transfer their copyrights to the journal.
See also our Open Access Policy.
