The uniformly most powerful invariant test for two models of detection function in point transect sampling

Authors

  • Riccardo Borgoni Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
  • Piero Quatto Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3544

Abstract

Estimating population abundance is of primary interest in wildlife population studies. Point transect sampling is a well established methodology for this purpose. The usual approach for estimating the density or the size of the population of interest is to assume a particular model for the detection function (the conditional probability of detecting an animal given that it is at a certain distance from the observer). Two popular models for this function are the half-normal model and the negative exponential model. However, it appears that the estimates are extremely sensitive to the shape of the detection function, particularly to the so-called shoulder condition, which ensures that an animal is nearly certain to be detected if it is at a small distance from the observer. The half-normal model satisfies this condition whereas the negative exponential does not. Testing whether such a hypothesis is consistent with the data at hand should be a primary concern. Given that the problem of testing the shoulder condition of a detection function is invariant under the group of scale transformations, in this paper we propose the uniformly most powerful.

References

R. BORGONI, M. CAMELETTI, P. QUATTO (2005), Comparing estimators of animal abundance: a simulation study, Atti del Convegno della Società Italiana di Statistica “Statistica e Ambiente”, Università degli Studi di Messina, pp. 181-184.

S. T. BUCKLAND (1987), On the variable circular plot method of estimating animal density, “Biometrics”, 43, 2, pp. 363-384.

S. T. BUCKLAND, D. R. ANDERSON, K. P. BURNHAM, J. L. LAAKE, D. L. BORCHERS, L. THOMAS (2001), Introduction to Distance Sampling, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

S. T. BUCKLAND, D. R. ANDERSON, K. P. BURNHAM, J. L. LAAKE, D. L. BORCHERS, L. THOMAS (2004), Advanced Distance Sampling, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

O. M. EIDOUS (2005), On Improving Kernel Estimators Using Line Transect Sampling, “Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods”, 34, pp. 931-941.

Y. P. MACK (1998), Testing for the shoulder condition in transect sampling, “Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods”, 27, pp. 423-432.

E. L. LEHMANN (2001), Elements of Large-Sample Theory, Springer, New York.

E. L. LEHMANN, J. P. ROMANO (2005), Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Springer, New York.

A. PANJABI (2003), Monitoring the birds of the Black Observatory, Fort Collins, Colorado.

S. ZHANG (2001), Generalized likelihood ratio test for the shoulder condition in line transect sampling, “Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods”, 30, pp. 2343-2354.

S. ZHANG (2003), A Note on Testing the Shoulder Condition in Line Transect Sampling, “Proceedings of the 2003 Hawaii International Conference on Statistics and related topics”.

Downloads

Published

2009-03-31

How to Cite

Borgoni, R., & Quatto, P. (2009). The uniformly most powerful invariant test for two models of detection function in point transect sampling. Statistica, 69(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3544

Issue

Section

Articles